MaryLovesJustice@gmail.com - (678)531-0262. Please visit my Google profile to access my links, YouTube channel jkempp703 for videos of real-time cyberstalking and terrorism to stop my advocacy. Visit Assistance to the Incarcerated Mentally Ill (AIMI); follow @KoffieTime. FORGIVENESS WITHOUT REPENTANCE IS COWARDICE. Some widgets and urls at FreeSpeakBlog lead to external sites that may use cookies. Thanks for visiting!
UPDATE: The U.S. Supreme Court legalized gay marriage in all 50 states on June 26, engendering outrage, particularly in the Bible Belt. Mississippi threatens to end marriages altogether. Two archived radio shows expose the hypocrisy of so-called Christians who oppose gay marriages but not fornication, adultery, mass incarceration, lynchings, and executions. The "NNIA1" tapes are available at Blogtalkradio for listening any time:
My reservation about legalizing gay marriage has always been the opportunity that this would present to penalize religious people of various faiths (and not Christians only) who feel that participating in gay marriages is wrong. I believe strongly in individual liberty and feel that consenting adults should have the right to do as they please, but I understand that legalizing gay marriage can cause infringements on millions of people's religious rights if their jobs or businesses are affiliated with marriages. People should not be coerced into violating their religious principles in order to keep their incomes. I have given thought to what would be fair to people on both sides of the issue: gay couples who want to marry and the religious judges, florists, and bakers who work in the marriage industry and object to such marriages. Some people compare gay marriages to interracial marriages, which were also illegal at one time. I do not agree.
I see this is a human rights and constitutional rights issue regarding the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Free exercise of one's religion must include the right to refrain from doing such things that one perceives to be violations of the dictates of his/her religion. Therefore, I suggest that persons who stand on their religious convictions against participating in gay marriages should have a way to abstain legally as CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS. I would assert that along with making gay marriages legal, decision makers must also respect conscientious objectors' First Amendment rights to abstain from participating on religious grounds without suffering financial persecution. Governments should issue a process for individuals, religious institutions, and corporations to apply for and be granted the status of "conscientious objectors" who are legally excused from participating in gay marriages. I believe that is the only way to be fair to everyone: gay couples and religious organizations and individuals who work or own businesses related to the marriage industry. There is no law saying "conscientious objectors" status must be reserved for military service. Governments should not legislate morality for people on either side of the gay marriage issue. Please consider this suggestion. Your comments are invited below.
Note: I originally wrote this suggestion at a "World News Daily" article entitled "Christians Facing New Status as 'Hated Minority.'" The government has long given room for people who object to laws on a religious basis to be excused from participating in actions that they consider as being violations of their religious principles. Read a brief history about the "conscientious objectors" status in Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscientious_objector
Below are 18 of the parties to the conspiracy of cover-up and terror who will be named in the lawsuit against USDOJ, et al. Officials and lawyers united to hide the secret arrest (kidnapping) and murder of Larry Neal, a lifelong mentally ill heart patient who was killed on August 1, 2003, after 18 days of secret arrest. Every individual the Neal family went to for justice joined the cover-up conspiracy instead. On August 11, our home was burglarized, and the only items stolen were the Neals v. The Cochran Firm lawsuit files and evidence which judges prevented from going to jury by dismissing our case wrongly. Then culprits sent a FAKE police officer to take our burglary report. DeKalb County Police reported to us that they had not dispatched an officer to take the burglary report yet. The fake police officer was sent to do the same thing The Cochran Firm was sent to do: keep crimes against the Neal family out of public records.
Mary L. Neal v. ~United States Department of Justice, for conspiring with Shelby County Government to allow officials to enter documents and testimony in federal reports and the jail's release hearing that omitted Larry Neal's death, which the feds knew about though our communication. The USDOJ allows or does online censorship and terrorism (online and in person) against me to keep the handicapped inmate's murder cover-up from being broadcast. The USDOJ withholds all records and withholds investigation of Larry's murder, which was done in a jail that had been placed under its direct overview due to years of inmate abuse and other violations and was operating under an Agreement with the USA. The government investigated and prosecuted the deaths of pit bulls on Michael Vick's ranch, but helped Shelby County Jail cover-up Larry Neal's murder and still does nine years later.
~Cochran Cherry Givens & Smith LLC (? - Firm uses different names from time to time. "The Cochran Firm" is/was even registered with the Tennessee Secretary of State's office as an "assumed name"), a/k/a The Cochran Firm - signed contract as Larry's wrongful death attorneys while its Memphis managing partner was a Shelby County Commissioner, which was a serious, secret conflict of interest. The Cochran Firm withheld all legal work while using U.S. Mail fraud to report work that was not actually being done to demand accountability for Larry Neal's negligence and murder. The law firm tricked the Neal family to let the Tennessee statute of limitations pass without any lawsuit being filed for Larry's secret arrest and death in custody. It became an accessory to murder after the fact.
~Shelby County Government (List Shelby County Government officials who the USDOJ allowed to file fraudulent reports that omitted Larry Neal after his kidnapping and death in Shelby County Jail)
~Atlanta Police Department (Officers told me I have no civil rights in Atlanta and threatened to Taser and arrest me for picketing The Cochran Firm)
~DeKalb County Police Department (Show reports police never investigated and name officers who came to my home to tell me I could not report crimes or complain to their superiors for ignoring my crime reports; Det. Miller, who claimed it is not illegal for stalkers to steal documents and court files off my computer, prevent my using the Internet, edit the text to my articles as I type, and destroy my machines)
~DeKalb County Government and CEO (ignored every attempt at contact about corruption, terrorism, and censorship; possibly sent police to tell me not to try to contact officials about police ignoring crimes)
~U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, (refuses to investigate or release records related to Larry Neal's secret arrest (kidnapping) and murder in Memphis Shelby County Jail in order to protect USDOJ officials who colluded with Shelby County Government officials to cover-up the inmate's murder in a jail that was under direct USDOJ overview after lawsuit by the U.S.A.)
~Julian Bolton, Esq. (former managing partner of the Memphis office of The Cochran Firm. Bolton conspired to hide the firm's conflict of interest from Plaintiffs in order to prevent the Neals from seeking real legal counsel regarding Larry Neal's wrongful death in Shelby County Jail, a facility to which Bolton owed a fiduciary duty as a long-standing member of the Shelby County Commission. The County Commission owns and operates the jail where Larry was kidnapped and murdered)
~David McLaughlin, Esq. (assigned Cochran Firm attorney who contracted with Hattie Neal and pretended to act as the Neal's wrongful death attorney in the matter of Larry Neal's kidnapping and murder, but actually kept the case inactive while the TN statue of limitations passed; used U.S. mail fraud to update Neals on the status of a case that McLaughlin kept secretly inactive to help Shelby County Government and DOJ officials cover-up the inmate's kidnapping and death in the jail)
~Hezekiah Sistrunk, Esq. (managing partner of the Atlanta office of The Cochran Firm office (Cochran Cherry Smith Sistrunk), which pretended in court not to be an office of The Cochran Firm or have any connection whatsoever with the national office of The Cochran Firm or with the Memphis office of The Cochran Firm. CCGSS was registered in Tennessee using the same address as the Memphis office of the Cochran Firm, and the Atlanta office of The Cochran Firm advertised and conducts business as The Cochran Firm),
~Angela Mason, Esq. (who wrote a pleading telling Judge Batten the color of the car that followed me home from work in 2008, although I never told anyone the color. She probably hired the man),
~Judge Wendy Shoob (who ruled there is no such thing as a Cochran Firm law office within the State of Georgia and dismissed Neals v. Cochran Firm from Georgia Superior Court in 2006 based on that lie months after the allowed limit for a judge to grant Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' case ),
~Judge Timothy Batten (who ruled that crimes done against the Neal family are "immaterial" and dismissed plaintiffs' lawsuit against The Cochran Firm),
~Cochran Firm's Attorneys (who put forth deliberate perjury in Georgia Superior Court and USDC),
~Tennessee Bar (name investigator and director who dismissed complaint against David McLaughlin after receiving proof that he lied to the bar, submitted fraudulent documents in the investigation, and threatened the Bar with legal action when a Bar's secretary was so astounded at the proof of malpractice presented that she shared the information with her friends in other government offices)
~Various Media Companies (attach films showing that Plaintiff is denied membership services enjoyed by all members whose freedom of speech is not curtailed to hide the government murder of Larry Neal),
~Michael Moon, cyberstalker who intercepted my call to a computer repair company and substituted himself for the technician. He put my laptop on an intranet over which he had control. It had an icon that said I had to call him to get online. Demanded $80 for the "service," check made to "AHS," who might be Atty. Hezekiah Sistrunk
~John Doe Stalkers (list in-person stalkers car tags and expose online stalkers via their IP addresses)
(32 numbered paragraphs, 27 links, 1 photo, 11 tweets, signature, 4 IP addresses of my cyberstalkers in paragraph 6). URGENT FREEDOM ALERT: S.968 is a bill pending before Congress that representatives intended to pass before Americans could learn about it and have an oppotunity to protest, but God used Sen. Wyden to temporarily block Senate's vote. If S.968 passes, the government will be able to legally take down targeted Internet sites. Prisoner activists, anti-war activists, workers' rights advocates, and everyone who does not bow to corporate masters of the universe can be silenced in one day. The bill may even be used to silence religious messages online. Please take advantage of Sen. Wyden's courageous move to temporarily block Senate's vote on this Nazi bill. Call, write, and email your representatives. Alert all human/civil rights activists. Notify minorities that S.968 can be used to stop Internet uploads of videos showing their unarmed loved ones being shot by police like Oscar Grant was on January 1, 2009, and to prevent them from telling about lynchings the media hides like the secret arrest and murder of Larry Neal, my mentally, physically disabled brother. Please do not allow everyone in the USA to be censored like I am now by their cyberstalkers. I have to number my paragraphs or cyberstalkers will simply delete the ones they do not want published. If CoIntelPro does not stop me, we will discuss S.968 on the Rev. Pinkney Blogtalk Show on Sun. 7/3/11 at 5pm EST (call-in number (347) 994-3644). Access taped shows at http://t.co/UNpfYWY (Beware: They sometimes redirect links). I must announce my next blog or the cyberdogs will make your computer skip it when you select "older post" at the end of this page. Please see "Mary Neal Goes to Washington for YOUR Justice Quest" at this link: http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2011/07/mary-neal-goes-to-washington-for-your.html - Obviously, my cyberstalkers can send Twitter messages. I got one saying "Oops! You Already Said That" when I tried to tweet: @Truthdig TRUTH is not approved on Internet in USA - VIDEO proofhttp://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/four-mary-neal-censorship-videos.html#Manning is jailed & I'm stalked online and in person
1. GOOGLE OPPOSES SENATE BILL 968, called the "Internet Censorship Bill." OpenCongress.org carries information on the contested bill at this link: http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s968/show - This freedom-killing bill was introduced by Senator Patrick Leahy, a Democrat like Rep. Alcee Hastings, who introduced H.R.645, the concentration camp bill, in January 2009. One might believe that Democrats want to eliminate the Constitution. S.968 contradicts: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press . . . " If S.968 passes, the censorship that has been done covertly to keep this civil/human rights activist offline to hide government crimes will become legal. Provisions of S.968 can be used to silence all voices of dissent on the Internet in the United States of America.
.2. Individuals and corporations that oppose government or corporate practices that erode justice in America are usually punished through the justice system. This is true of Google, which now faces antitrust allegations. Individuals like former Northwestern journalism professor David Protess, who founded the Medill Innocence Project, are fired. Human rights activists like Mary Neal, founder and director of Assistance to the Incarcerated Mentally Ill, experience censorship, cyberterror, and gangstalking. Because Google opposes the Internet censorship, the company is now under attack. According to msnbc.com, Google's stock fell $6.66 or 1.4 percent, to $473.56 in midday trading Friday after disclosure that the Internet giant faces a federal antitrust investigation. See an excerpt of the report below.
3. WASHINGTON — Federal regulators have begun a formal antitrust investigation into Google's business practices. In a blog post Friday, the Internet search giant said it received notification from the Federal Trade Commission of the review on Thursday.
4. Google said, "It's still unclear exactly what the FTC's concerns are."
5. But the inquiry is expected to focus in large part on whether Google abuses its dominance of Internet search to extend its influence into other lucrative online markets, such as mapping, comparison shopping and travel. Rivals complain that Google, which handles two out of every three Internet searches in the U.S., manipulates its results to steer users to its own sites and services and bury links to competitors. (A link to the full report is below.)
*****
6. Mainstream media censors news, probably according to government dictates. But the Internet enables people to report abuses of power in the United States. Fascists oppose Americans exercising First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and press. Senate bill 968 is the latest of several bills Congress introduced within the last few years that could be used to censor Americans. I presently experience cyberstalking to prevent reports about my mentally, physically handicapped brother's murder under secret arrest. Larry Neal died in 2003 in Memphis Shelby County Jail while the facility was directly supervised by the USDOJ due to many prior abuses of power. USDOJ offiicials colluded with the jail and The Johnnie Cochran Firm (under new management) to cover-up Larry's death, and the media agreed to censor the news report. Therefore, I began reporting the murder cover-up online and have published over 1,000 articles, emails, and blogs about that crime and the kangaroo court processes my mother and I endured when we sued The Cochran Firm for defrauding us as our wrongful death attorneys. Most of my articles are about other victimized Americans, including minorities and white citizens who lack wealth. A team of cyberstalkers was hired to monitor my computer useage 24/7 and prevent my net freedom. My computer security system cannot stop the stalkers, but it captures up to four IP addresses working simultaneously to attack my PCs whenever I go online. Police refuse to trace the IP addresses and prosecute the criminals, likely because they know who they are and who issued the orders. Right now there are four cyberstalkers breaking through my security. My security program reports: Deny PortScan Attack from Remote Host 192.168.1.254. The cyberstalkers' attack continued, and they got won. Now I cannot go to Twitter, send emails, or log in at Yahoo Answers. My security program reported: IE Sent Data to Remote Host 67.215.253.140; IE Sent Data to Remote Host 74.125.159.191; IE Sent Data to Remote Host 74.125.67.191; and Application "SYSTEM" sent data to Remote Host 67.125.253.140. When I recorded a video about the attack, cyberstalkers heard me talking, either by using the mic on my PC or listening through my cellphone. They can do both. Therefore, they allowed me to open this edit screen, which they denied me access to for over an hour before hearing me record proof of what S.968 will allow Big Brother to legally do to censor you like I am now. Presently, they do covert takeovers of targets' computers by remote hosts - actions that DeKalb Police call legal because police do not want to trace the IP addresses that attack me and prosecute cyberstalkers who I suspect are citizens police. Google my article "Citizens Police: My New Neighbors and Yours," if they let you. America seems to be in the position that pre-WWII Germany was. Freedom of speech and press are the first rights to go when a nation slides into fascism. We are not allowed to protest injustice online or in person. Over 2,600 protestors have been arrested since 2009 in America.
7. DeKalb County, Georgia police told me on June 28, 2011, that cyberstalkers stealing data from my hard drive and destroying my computers via covert remote access are not illegal activities. Officer Miller ignored the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the Internet Security Act of 2000, which made cyberstalking a crime. In America, laws are used to keep the "slave class" in line but are not enforced when working class taxpayers need protection from government abuses. In June 2010, Atlanta police officers told me they would taser and arrest me for making in-person reports about Larry's murder and other abuses of power. Therefore, I am essentially under an illegal injunction to prevent communicating about my brother's murder and abuses against other Americans. The illegal injunction is enforced by criminal computer geeks and by police officers who swore to protect and serve citizens.
8. If Congress passes laws that restrict freedom of press on the Internet, it would be possible for the government to secretly arrest and kill more "useless eaters" like Larry Neal (Hitler's term for mental patients). The USDOJ and Memphis Shelby County Jail refuse to divulge whether Larry was murdered (1) while being used as a medical test rat, (2) as a waterboarding subject to train the USDOJ's advanced interrogation specialists (torturers), (3) by Taser, (4) by restraint table or chair, (5) by brutality, or (6) by police withholding his vital heart drugs. Police kept the middle aged heart patient under secret incarceration and lied to his family and social worker, denying that Larry was incarcerated until he expired under circumstances that are treated like a national secret. Once the Internet is legally censored, police may come for your Autistic child, elderly mother with Alzheimers or age-onset dementia, or your bipolar friend. If/when that happens, you will have no way to report the murders to the public or report threats against your person and family for daring to complain about your handicapped relatives and friends who were secretly arrested and killed (see the Wrongful Death of Larry Neal website at this link: http://wrongfuldeathoflarryneal.com/ . Read about the latest crimes which were done to intimidate my family into silence about Larry's murder at this link: CoIntelPro Makes House Calls - http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/cointelpro-makes-house-calls.html.
9. I thank God for Google's commitment to protect freedom of press on the Internet and the fact that the overwhelming majority of people who voted at OpenCongress.org are against the S.968. Google is likely being persecuted by an antitrust investigation because the level of integrity the company's management has surpasses that of Justice Department officials and mainstream media owners. Google handles nearly 90% of Internet searches and offers a host of other valuable services. The company therefore sets the standard that other Internet search engines must strive to meet to be competitive. Not only is Google hated for protecting net freedom, but unethical companies like The (Johnnie) Cochran Firm fear Google Wiki, which allows Google Chrome users to publish comments that can be accessed at web pages by other Google Wiki users. The Cochran Firm does not want Google Wiki users to read comments I might post about the law firm's fraud against my elderly, grieving mother. Lawyers at The Cochran Firm contracted to be our wrongful death attorneys immediately after Larry died, then helped Shelby County Jail cover up his murder. In fact, David McLaughlin, Esq. kept Larry's wrongful death lawsuit secretly inactive while Tennessee's statute of limitations passed in order to protect the jail and USDOJ officials. The USDOJ officials may have accepted a payoff to ignore Larry's murder, which I communicated extensively with DOJ about in 2005. In 2006, USDOJ officials allowed Shelby County Jail to enter false testimony and reports into federal court records that omitted Larry's death. High government officials were indicted in Willacy County, Texas in 2008 for allegedly withholding federal investigations regarding inmate abuses and deaths. The indictments against several judges, former Vice President Chaney, and former Attorney General Gonzales alleged that they allowed abuses to go unpunished because they were private prison owners/investors and/or because they were paid to ignore crimes against humanity that happened inside correctional facilites. It is unfortunate that the agency that is charged with protecting Americans' civil liberties is itself corrupt.
10. Among other things, Senate bill 968 will enable the government to force Internet service companies to stop serving targeted websites. Therefore, websites that carry news the government does not want published could (and likely would) cease to exist on the Internet. This would likely be applied to my blogs advocating against mass incarceration and murders of mental patients; TruthOut.com, which suffered a cyberattack recently that removed 10 days of posts; Wikileaks, a site the government hates because it exposes hypocrisy in some of our leaders; CLG News, which publishes anti-war news; and IndyMedia, which has a false security warning claiming it would damage my PC to open that news site. In a short while after S.968 goes into effect, people might begin to censor themselves - watch what they post at their own blogs in fear that the blogs will be targeted for removal from the Internet. Independent news sites will also be very careful about news they allow members to publish in fear that the Government will target their Internet sites for removal. The censorship techniques that S.968 will make legal, such as redirecting users' browsers to prevent access to certain news, have been done to me by cyberstalkers for years. They do this to prevent me from learning about specific cases of abuses and murders of mentally ill Americans. They know I will republish the news at Twitter, Facebook, and in email messages, because I hope such accounts help decriminalize mental illness. Senate bill 968 can be used to scrub the Internet clean of any and all traces of police brutality and other government crimes. Senate bill 968 is the most Nazi piece of legislation I have come across. Below is an excerpt from a report about S.968 by Stephen Lendman, entitled "Internet Censorship Bill Introduced" (see the full report at the link below).
11. If enacted, PROTECT IP will give federal authorities "unprecedented power to attack the Internet's domain name system (DNS)," by:
12. -- forcing ISPs and search engines to redirect or reject user attempts to reach certain cites; and
13. -- vaguely call DNS servers: "server(s) or other mechanism(s) used to provide the Internet protocol addresses associated with a domain name."
14. This definition endangers other technologies, including operating systems, email and web clients, routers, and others able to provide IP addresses when given domain names like traditional DNS servers.
15. . . . Abigail Phillips explained . . . "It [S.968] includes 'a private right of action for intellectual property owners (as well as government to) seek injunctions against websites (allegedly) dedicated to infringing activities' in addition to court orders against third parties providing services to those sites."
16. Its [Senate bill 968's] language also adds new third-party provider categories, including "interactive computer services" and "servers of sponsored links," requiring they no longer serve targeted sites.
*****
17. Cyberstalkers are assigned to disrupt my Internet postings until they receive an order to destroy my computer again. In the meanwhile, they will not permit me to download Google Chrome, but make me use IE8, knowing that Microsoft is in favor of S.968. Although my gMail account is cyberstalked like my Yahoo Mail account is, I believe that if/when I subpoena records from Google to prove how many emails I am not allowed to receive, the company is not likely to work with the government or The Cochran Firm behind my back to falsify records. We hope our telephone carrier will also be forthcoming about the hundreds of phone calls we are not allowed to receive at (678) 531.0262. Our calls, other than from family members, are usually directed straight to voice mail, then deleted without anyone in our household being allowed to hear them. Sometimes, stalkers make our callers hear a lying message saying that our phone is disconnected. We live like prisoners in the United States, essentially kidnapped like Larry was. My family is absolutely denied the opportunity to communicate freely with the outside world. I am followed when I leave home, because criminals fear that I will use a computer or telephone over which they do not have direct control. S.968 will put virtually every computer in America under government control, and there will be no further need for cyberstalkers to censor human/civil rights activists like Mary Neal. If you doubt if my allegations are true, write to the USDOJ and ask about it:AskDOJ@usdoj.gov - WARNING: You may also become a CoIntelPro target for asking about the secret arrest and murder of a lifelong schizophrenic heart patient, Larry Neal.
18. If the government succeeds in making Google relax its stance against S.968 and other Internet censorship measures that are sure to follow, my family might be killed like cyberterrorists threatened often. Authorities presently worry about how the public would respond if officials or wealthy, unscrupulous lawyers do actual harm to a family for complaining online about the secret arrest and murder of a handicapped member. Over a million people know about Larry's murder despite the media blackout. The public also knows about cyber threats against me for advocating for justice for 1.25 million mentally ill Americans and immigrants who are cruelly imprisoned to boost prison profits rather than being treated for their dysfunctions in hospitals or community care under Assisted Outpatient Treatment programs. If you think I exaggerate their level of debauchery, please consider that my elderly mother has continuing nightmares about possible methods police used to exterminate Larry, but officials ignore our right to due process of law regarding open disclosure. Officials deny the Neal family any legal recourse regarding Larry's wrongful death and do everything they can to prevent us from revealing the murder cover-up and The Cochran Firm Fraud. But the public reads my articles and can see our videos, which I usually must have a third party upload due to determined cyberstalkers. I shiver to think about what sociopathic officials might do to people in our position once online censorship is legalized. Officials would no longer worry about truth-tellers' videos going viral online and destroying the carefully protected fasade that America is a democratic country that respects its citizens' right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
19. At OpenCongress.org, the public's votes regarding S.968 are 89% against and only 5% for the bill. Will persons elected to represent the People overrule our objections and pass S.968, in defiance of the U.S. Constitution? OpenCongress.org users can use this link to read the bill and cast votes for or against it as well as access articles and blogs about it: http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s968/show - Many companies and individuals have published valid concerns. Please see the following excerpt from a RxRights.org article condemning S.968 (access the full article at a link below):
20. At this time, the bill’s loudest and biggest critics, such as Google, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Demand Progress, decry that it extends government and private sector authority to a level that threatens our right to free speech under the First Amendment, stifles competition and innovation, and undermines our foreign policy stances toward authoritarian governments, as we admonish those states that censor free speech on the Internet. Some, such as Demand Progress, have criticized the bill because it blocks access to safe medicines . . . and we hope the others join in.
21. Senator Wyden has courageously made use of the senate rules to block the bill from reaching the floor for a vote. Senator Wyden’s remarks about Protect IP offer an eloquent summary of why the bill is terribly flawed. How long Sen. Wyden’s block will hold is uncertain, as the process of “cloture” – a vote by 60 senators – can end the block to bring the bill to a vote.
******
22. I understand how anxious fascists must be to stop paying cyberstalkers to prevent online advocacy they disdain. Regardless of how expert cyberstalkers are, computer security systems and digital cameras capture irrefutable proof that Americans are censored, and some of us are terrorized for publishing reports about government crimes. See my videos at YouTube channel JKEMPP703, and please read the article I wrote to expose the fact that human/civil rights organizations and activists are censored, "Internet Censorship American Style," at this link: http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2010/07/internet-censorship-how-they-do-it.html - One thing the article exposes is the fact that online publishers cannot know how much of their data actually is made visible to the public. Cyberstalkers are capable of blocking out paragraphs, videos, and redirecting links away from censored material, offenses that S.968 will make legal. Presently, censorship is a cruel game that unethical stalkers enjoy playing on their targets, and they are likely paid well with our own tax money. But cyberstalkers may get laid off if S.968 passes; their services will no longer be needed.
23. May God bless Senator Wyden. He obviously recognizes that Internet censorship is the modern equivalent to Nazi book burning. I hope that all congressional representatives of conscience will vote against S.968 and every other bill to censor the Internet. Numerous minorities and mentally ill people of all races are brutalized and/or murdered by police and prison guards every year. Such abuses of power would undoubtedly increase if those crimes become easier to cover up. When San Francisco B.A.R.T. officers killed Oscar Grant on January 1, 2009, with a single bullet to the young father's back, they immediately tried to collect all cell phones with video capabilities from commuters who were horrified about the public lynching. The officers wanted to prevent any film of Grant's murder from being uploaded on social media and broadcast around the world, but they failed. The Internet allows people to publish articles and videos proving government crimes that mainstream media censors.
24. As we near Independence Day, I implore senators to please honor the sacrifices made by millions of United States military families throughout this nation's history. Do not let fascists destroy the average American's only method of mass communication - the Internet. Stop the nation's slide into Nazism. If China has bought America, let us immediately quit spending trillions of dollars on wars and pay them back. Please do not pass S.968 and allow the government to censor all Americans the way that I am.
29. OpenCongress.org users can use this link to read the bill and cast votes for or against it as well as access articles and blogs about it: http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s968/show
31. And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. - Revelation 18:2
32. Cyberstalker-prevented tweet 7/2/11:
@WebReadyLawyers @radicalsonly @TheLawNews @legallawwatch @topsy @Google @Twitter @BIG_GOV S.968 vs. First Amendmenthttp://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2011/07/senate-bill-968-to-remove-dissidents.html (If cyberstalkers had not prevented the tweet, Twitter would have automatically shortened the link for me to make it fall within the 140-character limit.)
33. Note: Cyberstalkers know that I rely on spellcheck. They disconnected that feature in my blogs and at my wordprocessing software on my desktop, so please forgive typos until I can edit the article at a computer not under their immediate control. Right now three IP addresses are fighting to break through my inadequate security system and stop me from re-publishing this news from my other blog MaryLovesJustice at this link: http://marylovesjustice.blogspot.com/ - Cyberstalkers are preventing me from going to Twitter.com, just like S.968 provides for the government to do to you - the cyberstalkers redirect my browser. If you allow this Nazi bill to pass, it can be used to keep you off Twitter, Facebook, or any site by redirecting your browser. To learn what it is like to be a prisoner in America without being locked up, visit my blog "JUSTICE GAGGED" at http://justicegagged.blogspot.com/ - PLEASE SAVE YOURSELVES! SAVE FREEDOM OF PRESS IN AMERICA. DENOUNCE S.968.PRAY with me that God damns S.968 to save America from fascism. See 11 of my tweets below and follow @koffietime, if they let you - http://twitter.com/koffietime (cyberstalkers won't allow a "follow me at Twitter button to work at my blogs).
@thehill @ACLU @blackvoices Don't kill the First Amendment! See "S.968 to Remove Dissidents from the Internet"http://t.co/4Z1qW27
3 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete »
@Google @iSupremeCourt S.968 is unconstitutional, correct? "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press"
19 hours ago Favorite Reply Delete »
@Advocates4kids @APAPsychiatric @HBBP @ACLU @MadameNoire Persecuting @Google 4 opposing S.968, Internet Censorship Billhttp://t.co/kfApJUS
19 hours ago Favorite Reply Delete »
@TheLawNews @Google Revised: Google Persecuted with Antitrust Allegations for Opposing S.968 (Internet censorship bill) http://t.co/kfApJUS
19 hours ago Favorite Reply Delete »
@Google DeKalb Co. Police said cyberstalkers stealing my data and destroying my PCs is legal & they refuse to use IP addresses to find them.
1 Jul Favorite Reply Delete »
@Eldrin_Bell Welcome to @koffietime. Pls seehttp://t.co/eSFKR0J4 articles & videos. See also http://t.co/6qqh99Hand share censored news
1 Jul Favorite Reply Delete »
@PrincessDelap Stalkers make it hard 4 me to post ANY videos re prison profiteers & Cochran Firm Fraud; pls share VIDEOhttp://t.co/v8bIWs9
27 Jun Favorite Reply Delete »
@TheLawNews @legallawwatch VIDEO describing censorship & stalking 2 hide CochranFirm fraud http://t.co/v8bIWs9 See also http://t.co/mXE9gFk
27 Jun Favorite Reply Delete »
@LawScribbler You can access & vote for my FreeSpeakBlog on Invira.net http://t.co/BHSXvSX CENSORED law news. Pls. object to Senate Bill 968
27 Jun Favorite Reply Delete »
@PrincessDelap @Brookpete @ALCU Stressful advocating for justice while dealing w censorship and stalkers VIDEO http://t.co/v8bIWs9
27 Jun Favorite Reply Delete »
@N_A_D_P I am censored to hide my brother's secret arrest & murder & advocacy against DP. VIDEO -http://t.co/v8bIWs9
27 Jun Favorite Reply Delete
.
Mary Neal Assistance to the Incarcerated Mentally Ill http://www.care2.com/c2c/group/AIMI
UPDATED MARCH 8-31, 2011 - (56 paragraphs, 27 links, one video, two photos, and a signature block - count them, but since links do not open in a new window, please read the blog before using links. Under "Examples," see a report by Truthout.orgsaying it was attacked on March 30, 2011.)
HAVE YOU EVER WONDERED WHY your advocacy movement or human rights organization does not have more members or receive more financial support from the public? Do your online petitions have disappointing results? You could be a victim of Internet censorship. Visit my YouTube channel to view over 20 videos that capture real-time cyber censorship at major Internet social networks and online news services as well as actual gangstalking at this link - http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=jkempp703 - I filmed hundreds such videos over the last couple of years that prove I am cyberstalked and censored and add new films when I can overcome censorship enough to do so. Using the Internet to promote human rights and communicate about controversial subject matter is fast, convenient, and cheaper than using the mail or phones. However, advocacy for human and civil rights historically meets strong opposition from wealthy, powerful people who unite to preserve the status quo. Consider what slavery abolitionists endured and the bloody Civil War. Remember the violence that came against the women’s suffrage movement, labor movement, and civil rights movement.
Effective leaders of social movements and government officials throughout American history have been monitored, misinformation was used against them, and some were assassinated. It would be naive to believe that individuals or corporate and government entities no longer use their vast resources to limit social change. This article reveals information that every online advocacy organization and individual activist should know to identify online censorship. Human/civil rights advocates must recognize how much censorship threatens their access to the public online. Hopefully, the information in this article will reveal how important it is to reject voting for elected officials via Internet. The party with the best cyberstalkers would win every time.
Update Feb. 9, 2015 (one paragraph): I discovered last week a new type of censorship being applied to my articles. Please note whether a suffix was added to the link you reach when you use links. If a suffix was added, you were diverted from my blog and are being shown an article that may omit data and links that are in my actual articles. If this happens, please delete the suffix up to the "html," in order to reach my blogs. Note that not all websites end in "html," so please compare the document you reach to the link you used to ensure that you were not diverted to a fake view. Diverting links was a provision under SOPA that did not pass in Congress (it died without a vote), however, censorship is illegally used in the USA against so-called dissidents (people who disagree with Nazism). "Google, Don't Be Evil" http://justicegagged.blogspot.com/2015/02/google-dont-be-evil.html REJECT GOVERNMENT-ISSUED INDIVIDUAL INTERNET I.D. NUMBERS. The government is not safeguarding freedom of press and free speech for certain news. Subjects covered herein include preventing impersonators, cyber censorship via remote access, redirected and deactivated links, web site attacks, gatekeeper services, attacks on petitions, scrambled data on emails, Internet radio censorship, Internet gatekeeping services, computer-specific views of web data, minimizing exposure to censored news in citizens journalism, false security alerts, inoperable widgets, and security through diligence. March 23, 2011 Update:I just learned about a new way to censor online data: Cyberstalkers changed the font on part of my text to make it fade into the background at my new blog http://MaryLovesJustice.blogspot.com - This was done to censor my article "Libya, USA."
In 2006, roughly 20,000 people from all over America met in Jena, Louisiana to support justice for six African American youths who were arrested for their reaction to racism at their school. Violence erupted among students after nooses were hung from a tree on campus to denote that the shaded area underneath the tree was for whites only. (Details are in the link below.) The Jena6 demonstration was a grass roots effort that was completely organized online. With the advent of the Internet, people no longer had to rely on mainstream media, which censors news in anticipation of receiving a government bailout and because major media companies are owned by some of the same elitists who benefit by containing certain news. Since the Jena6 demonstration proved the Internet is a powerful tool for galvanizing public support around social issues, the Internet has become a battleground. In fact, when my PC boots up slow, the word "InfoWars" used to appear on the sign in screen. I suppose my cyberstalkers thought that was funny. Today, there are many online attacks against human rights and civil rights advocates and against certain political messages going forward. Laws are being considered and passed in Congress to restrict Internet usage. Covert, illegal sabotage is used to impede online communication by environmentalists, anti-death penalty advocates, prisoner rights activists, the peace movement, and other movements. Wikipedia carries information on the Jena6 demonstration at this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jena_Six
I am founder and director of an online human rights organization called Assistance to the Incarcerated Mentally Ill ("AIMI") (see the link in my signature block below). Our 260+ members assemble online from across America and some foreign countries and advocate to help decriminalize mental illness, end capital punishment and stop wrongful convictions. Such improvements in the justice system would negatively impact prison profits. Additionally, I use the Internet to expose The Cochran Firm fraud, a conspiracy to use a noted law firm to spy on minority citizens and also block or limit the success of their justice quests in the civil court system. Reporting the online censorship I encounter and sharing my real-time cyber censorship videotapes may help other targeted persons and organizations recognize when and how their online communication is being attacked.
Prevent Impersonators. Effective civil/human rights activists and organizations must post a "Follow Me at Twitter" button and publish your Facebook name on the front page of your website. Only by doing that will people know your Twitter and Facebook names and avoid sending tweets to, or posting on the FB walls of, an impersonator who they believe is your organization or you. Posting your Twitter and FB names on your website will also make it more difficult for cyberstalkers to use your name to post data that the public will think came from you or your organization when it did not. (Cyberstalkers prevent a "Follow Me at Twitter" button from working here at FreeSpeakBlog - http://FreeSpeakBlog.blogspot.com - I had one up and running for months, but it showed my true Twitter profile page, and the one I accessed by way of web browsing was different. I complained, and the "Follow me at Twitter" button became unresponsive. Now I cannot get the widget to post at FreeSpeakBlog. On December 6, 2010, over 11,000 of my advocacy tweets were covertly deleted at Twitter, but thankfully, they were re-posted after I complained for two months.) March 6, 2011, I received notice of a new follower at Twitter - @revpinkney48. Rev. Pinkney is president of the Benton Harbor, Michigan NAACP, and I often speak with him on his Blogtalk Radio broadcasts on Sundays at 5:00pm EST. He used to follow me and I him, but like many of my Twitter followers, his name was covertly deleted. The new follower @revpinkney48 is not he.
Workgroups and Remote Access. Much of the censorship I am subjected to is done by illegal takeovers of the administrative role for my home computers. Saboteurs place my PCs on their workgroups, then use their position as administrators over the domain whereon my PCs are placed to control my Internet accessibility and prevent my postings as they see fit. As my PCs' administrator, cyberstalkers also have access to add and delete computer programs and documents on my hard drive. Additionally, saboteurs seem to use network connection 1394 to monitor and exercise limited control over my computers even when I work offline. If I disable or remove that network connection, workgroup administrators are able to create a new connection that is invisible on my view. Since I learned the importance of deleting or disabling connection 1394, the option to do that is usually not available on my PCs any longer. Domain administrators can disable whatever computer functions they choose to for PCs in their workgroup. They similarly sabotage PCs belonging to my family members. Cyberstalkers can also use supposedly secure programs like Adobe Air, Messenger, Net Meeting, etc. I cannot allow any of those on my PC. In fact, probably the reason I am able to do this update at my home was by deleting Net Meeting a few hours ago. I had to use a special disk to do it. When I try deleting programs cyberstalkers use without the disc, I get an error message saying the program is in use, although I never used them. Or I get an error message saying I do not have the administrative rights necessary to make said deletions, although I bought the computer, buy the Internet service, and never placed any of my PCs on a network.
I CANNOT STRESS ENOUGH HOW IMPORTANT THIS IS: Defense attorneys who are representing clients in criminal cases, especially if prosecutors are seeking the death penalty, must use a computer that is not connected to the Internet, has never been online, and has no Internet wireless card. In other words, use an old computer or a typewriter. Recently an attorney (I believe in Texas) was preparing a last-minute appeal when his computer system started acting strange. He called the court to say he was running into problems and requested that the court remain open to give him an opportunity to finish the appeal and get it filed. That courtesy is sometimes extended in death penalty cases I understand, but the judge went home and the client was executed. Judging by the amount of cyberstalking I encounter when I try to publish anything whatsoever against capital punishment and the amount of discussion strands about DP that are deleted after they are published, read by hundreds, and commented on by many members at AIMI, I believe it likely that the attorney's computer problems were caused by cyberstalking. Cyberstalkers censor nearly everything I publish against capital punishment, prison profiteering, and Tasering.
See a VIDEO below showing that my home PC is prevented from printing links at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzpUi3IqRbg - Saboteurs did that to my PC after I printed and distributed fliers about prisoner abuse and also notified the public that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s final speech is censored online. References to "dogs" and "water hoses" and "illegal injunctions" were deleted from nearly all of the presentations of his Mountaintop address that appear as online text documents. If you change computers to escape cyberstalkers, always keep the hard drive from the previous computer. Computer forensics experts can retrieve data, detect Trojans and viruses, sometimes trace the source of cyberstalking, and give expert testimony at trial.
Censorship by direct takeover of PCs like I experience is probably only done to individual targeted people and very small organizations. To have a semblance of net freedom, I must have my PCs wiped clean and the operating system and programs re-installed frequently. Unfortunately, when I use my home phone to arrange for computer service, contact information for my service tech is revealed to those who monitor my phone calls. The last times my PC was "serviced," technicians actually loaded my PC with malware and placed it on a workgroup domain. See my FreeSpeakBlog article "HOME INVASION, which is available at the link above my signature block at the bottom of this article.
Redirected or Deactivated Links and Disappearing Data. Censorship is illegal and abhorrent, so it is done covertly. Saboteurs sometimes deactivate or redirect links and make parts of web pages invisible. Deactivated links still appear in color with underlines intact, but they do not work. Some links have been sabotaged for spaces to appear when they are copied and pasted to prevent people from sharing the data that is at that link (discussed below). Other times, links are redirected. Redirected links carry users to web pages other than the ones they should. Deactivated and redirected links can go undetected unless one tries to use the links from a PC that is outside the target’s network and is not otherwise monitored/controlled by the saboteurs. Link-shortening services make it easy for censorship to happen, because the links can be redirected to an edited version of the data rather than the original input. Whenever possible, it is best to use your full links or use a trusted service. See more about link-shortening services below at "gatekeepers." March 2011, I discovered that my Google profile link is redirected to a link "about" my Google profile. The introductory paragraph about me being founder/director of Assistance to the Incarcerated Mentally Ill is positioned at the bottom of the document "about" my profile, and cyberstalkers prevented my moving it to the top. See an example of a redirected link and notice the word "about" at the end of the link when you reach the web page - http://google.com/profiles/MaryLovesJustice - I learned about a child who was executed in South Carolina in 1944 and used his story to show how important it is that children have at least the same rights to a Miranda warning and an attorney during interrogation by police as adults have. That is something the U.S. Supreme Court is deliberating in March 2011, and I combated intense cyberstalking to post the article (see "Juvenile Justice: Kids 4 Cash" at my MaryLovesJustice blog). Omega418 features a terrific stream of photographs and black history stories at her Flickr account, including photos and a story about George Stinney, the little 14-year-old who was executed. I copied and pasted her link at Twitter, and the part after the @ would not link. Therefore, using the link took people to a "page not found." Always test links after you copy/paste them, and re-try your links days and months later. I had never seen an @ in links before - it might be a built-in mechanism to prevent sharing targeted news. I am not a cyberstalker, so I am not sure. Visit her site at this link: http://www.flickr.com/photos/22067139@N05/(if they let you).
Oftentimes, links are coded for spaces to appear therein when they are copied and pasted into a new email or Word document. Naturally, that cripples the spread of whatever information is being censored that would have been accessible if the link was not sabotaged. When you receive a link via email that does not work, try copying it and pasting it into a Word document. Then do a search/replace for spaces and remove them. After that, the link should work. Lately when I enter a new share at my Care2 Sharebook, I am not given a rich text screen. Instead, I must enter or edit my shares in a small screen that is about 1" long and 4" wide in HTML view, which shows all the codes in a document. Last night, I was updating an article I published a year ago regarding the wrongful execution of Philip Workman. I discovered some time ago that although I make sure my links lead where they should when I publish an article, it is a good idea to re-check links later. Sometimes the documents or videos they originally led to become unavailable, or the links may be covertly redirected to prevent people from reaching the intended data. Because I was given an HTML screen instead of a rich text screen to update my Workman article, I learned that what looks like empty spaces in links is really not empty, but percent signs and numbers were in the spaces. The affected link I found in my Workman article at my Care2 Sharebook should have led to one of my Blogtalk radio interviews with Brothas Keepa. The link to that radio interview is correctly posted below:
I realized that people who tried to access my Brothas Keepa radio interview at Care2 had been prevented from doing so because the spaces were added to my link. Always check your links when you publish them on websites and emails to be sure they work and lead to the right data. If you write about controversial matters, re-check your links at intervals to see if they still work. I update my articles as new information surfaces; therefore, I frequently return to my previous posts and archived work. I was disappointed to find that most of my AIMI group's articles regarding deaths by Tasers and advocacy for people facing the death penalty, including those about Troy Davis, were covertly deleted from our Care2 group. People who write online frequently return to previously published work to link it to new articles. Cyberstalkers must be unaware of that fact, or they do not care if their censorship is discovered. Freedom of speech and press are rights that Americans have on paper, but violations are common.
CENSORSHIP AROUND NATIONAL ISSUES
In 2009, a health care organization posted a document on the Internet making suggestions about the national health care plan. There was a link to get more information, but the link did not actually work. It appeared blue and underlined, which was misleading. The organization was grateful when I called and notified them of the sabotage. The organization's ideas about national health care reform were not actually reaching anyone.
Similarly, one of President Obama's emails carrying an update on the national health care bill he supported was censored when I published it at Care2. The link that recipients were invited to use to report why the bill had their support was attacked. The link was dragged by an unseen hand to the bottom of the post, and I assume it would have disappeared altogether had I not disconnected my Ethernet wire. I filmed the interference and notified Senator Webb via email.
NAMI is a national mental health advocacy organization with over 210,000 members. NAMI posted a letter endorsing Congressional bill H.R.619, which was introduced in Congress in January 2009 by Eddie Johnson (D-TX). The bill proposed resuming Medicaid insurance for inpatient psychiatric patients who quality for Medicaid. Medicaid was discontinued for psychiatric inpatients decades ago, leading to today's overcrowded prison conditions, discrimination against mentally ill Americans and immigrants, and $50 billion per year prison costs to taxpayers, half of which is incurred by imprisoning 1.25 million mentally ill people who should be in hospitals or community care, depending on their offenses and functionality. NAMI's letter of endorsement for H.R.619 had a link that ran on for at least a half mile. I never saw anything like it. Extra long links sometimes force people who wish to share the link to use a link shortening service, and that can be bad news. See "Link Shortening Service" in this blog. For the past two weeks (today is March 8, 2011), I have been unable to use any photographs at Google Images. When I try to upload the photos into my blog using the URL that shows on my view at Google Images, Blogger rejects the URLs. One would think that Google Blogger would be able to use Google Images links, but not lately (for me, anyway). Photographs are often attacked by cyberstalkers because one photo can save a thousand words. Since I did not trust the link that was applied to NAMI's endorsement for H.R.619, I copied and pasted NAMI's letter onto my Care2 profile page in its entirety. Please Google "Mary Neal Care2" to read it. The bill that could have had significant impact for millions of mental patients and their families and friends, community safety across the country, and possibly reduced expenditures for taxpayers was never published by any news source, lest Americans find out the opportunity to decriminalize mental illness was available. Now it is too late, as the bill expired when the new Congress took office. Hopefully, it will be resubmitted.
Petitions. Regarding online petitions, saboteurs remove names at will. That can be detected if petitions are checked regularly to verify that signatures remain at the same line number where they were originally input. Either print petition signatures daily or save them on discs. If Jack signed a petition at line 344 on July 6, his signature cannot appear at line 320 on July 30 unless 24 signatures before his name were removed. Print the signature pages on your petition often to know which number a given signature should appear beside. You can also use the "print screen" function to capture a picture of the petition's signature pages as they should appear and save the screen shots on disc. Unless you monitor your petitions, cyberstalkers can and do remove signatures without your knowledge. Several people notified me that their signatures were removed from my petition for the United States Department of Justice (USDOJ) to release records to my family regarding the secret arrest and wrongful death of Larry Neal, my handicapped brother who was murdered in Memphis Shelby County Jail while the jail was already under federal overview. The USDOJ refuses to answer my Freedom of Information Act request for records about Larry's death or investigate it. Unlike stealing votes during a presidential election, stealing names from Larry's petition does not help the government appear to be democratic. Murders of African American mental patients are just as illegal as any other murder even if there were zero names on Larry's petition: http://www.petitiononline.com/Neal/petition.html - Many people report abuses to themselves or their loved ones and denial of justice at the petition site. Their comments are accessible by selecting "signatures" at the bottom of the petition.
Also, saboteurs are able to prevent people from signing your petitions. Numerous persons reported encountering a denial of service issue (DoS) at petitions I publish online. Their support for the petitions was rejected repeatedly. My signature and comments are also frequently rejected from human rights petitions. Sometimes I try to contact the petitions’ originators to let them know signatures are being rejected, but not always. Chances are that most people whose signatures are denied have no easy way to notify the petition's sponsors about their problem signing. Always position an email address and/or phone number for the petition’s originator on petitions' signature page to make it easy for people to let you know if they encounter problems signing. Petitions about important issues that receive disappointing support should always be checked for DoS, even if no one notifies you about rejected signatures. If your petition has too few signatures, it is important to check for DoS on PCs not associated with the petition originators. I have found that petition signatures that are accompanied by comments are deleted less often.
On our petition to USDOJ for DOG JUSTICE for LARRY NEAL, you can read comments by petitioners who state they had signed the petition before but could not find their names and comments any longer. My petition to stop censorship and terrorism against Mary Neal has a DoS for just about everyone who tries to sign it, meaning that you can expect to see that on my videos, also. The petition is at this link: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/Justice4Maryneal - I publish some of my videos at the YouTube channel jkempp703, and others I save to fit into the book jacket for my book, "Cochran Firm Fraud." Cyberdogs stole my query letter to publishers off my desktop, and they await my putting addresses of perspective publishers in emails or in letters typed on my computer so the publication can be prevented. The book will certainly be a best seller in the hands of a good publishing company, if they are not all in the New World Order already. The first week of March 2011, cyberstalkers stole my notes documenting the fact that blacks in the South were used as medical test subjects for Big Pharm without their knowledge or consent years after the Tuskegee Experiments. The information is included to a limited degree in my HubPages article, "NAACP vs. Black Cigarette Smokers."
. Cyberstalkers Attack Web Pages. Targeted comments are sometimes rendered invisible in the lineup of comments under news articles. Cyberstalkers can do that without any gap appearing in the comments that remain visible. Furthermore, people who use their websites or their web pages at social networks to put forth viewpoints about controversial matters should be aware that parts of their web pages can be rendered invisible without leaving any apparent gap in the data that remains. However, the censored web pages look intact to the originators when they view them after logon. Targeted individuals can catch that cyber censorship by looking at their web pages without logging in (unless their PC is directly sabotaged like mine is), or by visiting their web pages using a PC that is not associated with them in any way whatsoever, such as the PCs at a public library, a friend's house, or a computer rental business like FedEx Kinko's. None of this works for me any longer. I am usually followed to computer rental businesses to see which computer I use so it can be attacked. At public libraries, computer users are identified through their library number.
Using PCs at public libraries is like having an INDIVIDUAL INTERNET I.D. NUMBER. Users input their library card number to use the machines. If you are targeted for censorship (and I have found that all effective human/civil rights organizations are to some degree), then the cyber censorship personnel can control what you are allowed to post plus limit your access to information on the web. Even when I use library computers, if I try to open a link cyberstalkers do not want me to access, the link will not open, whether I am browsing the web or trying to open links sent to my email box at MaryLovesJustice@gmail.com.- See a VIDEO I took at DeKalb County, Georgia Public Library showing that I was prevented from submitting news at Care2 News Network about Hank Skinner facing imminent execution while denied DNA tests. We have videos taken at the library showing that I was prevented from commenting or voting on polls at Voting Central.
After publishing several Voting Central polls, I was censored and no longer permitted to answer members' polls. Eventually, polls that had been read by thousands were deleted. I found out I was blacklisted when I tried responding to a poll regarding the State of the Union Address in 2010, although my comment was merely that I missed the live telecast. An error message repeatedly appeared saying that I had to log in to vote or comment, although I was already logged in at Voting Central. The video clearly shows the top, right of the screen said "Mary Neal" and my only option was "log out." After I complained repeatedly, my polls at Voting Central were deleted. The polls asked whether: 1) Town hall meetings should be held before setting aside the Bill of Rights to enforce H1N1 vaccines in America; 2) Americans knew the H1N1 vaccines had different serums, with a safer serum being given to military personnel and dignitaries in some countries; 3) post-conviction DNA testing should be available (at inmate's expense) to prove innocence to prevent wrongful executions and prison terms for crimes the inmates did not do; 4) the Neal family should continue to fight for justice regarding the secret arrest and wrongful death of Larry Neal, my mentally, physically handicapped brother, and THE COCHRAN FIRM FRAUD; and 5) if Thomas Arthur, wrongfully convicted man on Alabama's death row for nearly 30 years, should be executed despite the fact that his DNA test results that a judge placed under seal in 2009 ruled him out as the contributor of any DNA evidence at the crime scene that was tested. These were valid questions, but I am not allowed to ask them, and unfortunately, no one else was asking. What has happened to America's media - supposedly the "backbone of democracy"?
My Google profile is frequently attacked. It has over 30 paragraphs, but usually, not one of them is allowed to show at http://www.google.com/profiles/MaryLovesJustice - I have not been permitted to edit my Google profile since autumn 2009 when I added information about a witness to cyberstalking on my home PC. (March 2011 - When you use my Google profile link above, it has now been redirected to a link "about" my profile. The word "about" appears at the end of the link at the web page where you will be redirected. Try it. This is discussed in depth in my article at MaryLovesJustice blog called "Libya, USA.") A neighbor was visiting my home one night when I was online, and she saw the lethal injection bed with my name underneath suddenly appear when I opened a page at Care2. That cyberterror is only one of the crosses that cyberdogs burn to punish me for telling about the prejudice injustice system and The Cochran Firm fraud. My witness gave me an affidavit attesting to the cyberterrorism she witnessed, which I filed in USDC in my lawsuit against The Cochran Firm. A few months later, my witness was stopped enroute to work by DeKalb County, Georgia police officers and beaten so badly by "peace" officers that she left the traffic stop in an ambulance. I copied my Google profile to a blog in hopes that the public might be able to access it, even though my actual Google profile is often rendered invisible at the link where it should appear. Access the blog at this link: CENSORSHIP ALERT: Mary Neal's Google Profile Rendered Invisible: http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2010/07/censorship-alert-mary-neals-google.html
Scrambled Data. I have received emails with data spaced only ½ line apart, which makes the data run together on the recipients’ view. If you receive such emails, highlight and copy the data, then post it in a Word document where the formatting will be corrected. If that does not clear the formatting issue to make the text legible, copy/paste it into a Word document using the "paste special" feature, and select "no formatting." Another helpful tip is that when data is copied/pasted from the Internet into Word documents, covert coding that is not visible online is sometimes clearly discernible. For example, I have copied/pasted some of my posts from our online group AIMI into Word documents and the words "mark this" appeared in red at the top margin. Those posts were later covertly deleted from AIMI.
Internet Radio. Internet radio show hosts must state the date of their show at the beginning of each broadcast and several times throughout the show. Otherwise, cyberstalkers can substitute one of the hosts' earlier shows for any show that is targeted for censorship. This happened when former Memphis Shelby County Jailer Earley Story appeared on Rev. Pinkney Blogtalk Radio Show a couple of Sundays ago. I tried to tweet the July 11 show, but it would not tweet. I then downloaded it using the link provided for the July 11 show, but another show from a previous date downloaded in its place. I tweeted Blogtalk Radio about the sabotage and the problem was corrected. Mr. Story is a former jail guard who sued Shelby County Jail alleging he was fired and framed on drug charges because he refused to help cover-up the death of a mentally ill inmate who was beaten to death while incarcerated. The substituted Rev. Pinkney show did not have Story's interview, of course.
Gatekeepers. Many email users and online networks use services that require persons who attempt to communicate with them to input a captcha code. I have videos showing how such services can be used to prevent people from communicating by falsely claiming the code was entered incorrectly. To help ensure that people are not being blocked from communicating with you or your organization, post contact information in your permanent email signature block as well as on your website’s home page, including an email address, a P.O. address and/or phone number. If your contact information is only available under a tab on your website that cannot be accessed by people who did not clear your gatekeeper service, you may never know how many people were prevented from communicating with you or joining your network or organization. Of course, emails can be prevented from reaching targeted people. I am so censored, that I do not actually receive any emails from the email box that appears at the top of AIMI's website at Care2. I sent emails to that email box myself from numerous computers, and none of the messages went to my Care2 email box as they should have. I asked Care2 to remove the deceptive email address for AIMI, but they will not. Therefore, I put my gMail email box on the billboard page, like that would help. The truth is that whenever I try to open gMail, I am seldom allowed to enter it on the first try. After repeated tries, it opens. That is probably to give cyberstalkers a chance to delete any of my emails that they please before I see what should be there. But that is much better than what happened at Yahoo Mail. The videos I have on cyberstalking there are "legion," in the Biblical sense - many, many.
Services that shorten links often are used prevent my data from reaching the public. The links can be covertly re-directed to an edited version of your Internet input that omits or distorts data. For instance, I used a cell phone to view where my Twitter links that are shortened using bit.ly actually lead. Some led to what looked like my FreeSpeakBlog posts, but the data was arranged in a single line (vertical data rather than horizontal as it should be). Therefore, each line of text only had one single alphabet! I ordinarily use SHORT URL when I need a shorter link, but I prefer to use the entire original link. Example: I was repeatedly prevented from sending this tweet: @Defender411 Pls send this link to trial attys re my bro's murder cover-uphttp://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2010/07/cochran-firm-fraud.html - However, this tweet was allowed to post: @Defender411 Pls send this link to trial attys re my bro's murder cover-up http://bit.ly/cwHAwk - When one uses ful links, readers know where the post was published by looking at the link, and they can go to the source websight and possibly find the data even if the link was attacked. The data should be the same whether one accesses my ATTORNEY NEEDED article through the bit.ly link or the full link, so why would the censorship crew prevent my long link from posting although I have enough space for the full link on Twitter? The data at the shorter link can easily be redirected later to an edited version of the document. Link shortening services may not be aware when people's links have been redirected, so it is important to use a trusted service or input your full link.
Are you sure it posted? Often when I publish discussion items at my online groups or publish comments to news, my input only appears to have published on my view. That happened on July 7 when I worked at Twitter, also. I published five or six tweets. Then I decided to add a "follow me at Twitter" gadget on my FreeSpeakBlog. I tested my new gadget immediately, and my Twitter profile page appeared. I should have seen my latest tweets, but I did not. Select tweets were missing. However, the missing tweets appeared on my profile page on the screen that I opened without using the "follow me at Twitter" widget. The "follow me" widget took me to my real profile page at Twitter, and I saw the tweets cyberstalkers allow to be public. When I went to Twitter without using the "follow me" widget on my PC or a library computer where I logged on using my library card number, I saw all of my tweets in my profile timeline, including the ones that the public never sees. Maybe I should not have exposed that trick, because now I am not permitted to have a "follow me at Twitter" widget at my blogs. I am KoffieTime at Twitter - http://twitter.com/koffietime - In December 2010, someone decided almost none of my tweets were approved for public view and deleted 11,000 human rights tweets. I complained often and repeatedly and prayed about it, and they were reinstated in February 2011. Julian Assange's Wikileaks tweets were not deleted, to my knowledge. I suppose decriminalizing mental illness and exposing The Cochran Firm Fraud, my advocacy, is perceived as being more dangerous than exposing confidential government communications, which Assange allegedly did.
The only way I found to know when data really publishes online is to work with two computers. On one computer, sign in as a member of your networks, but not on the other computer. I have videos showing that although the data should be the same on both computers, the computer where I did not sign on as a member is frequently missing some of my posts that cyberstalkers intend for me to believe published. Take your laptop to Kinko's, the public library, or a friend's house to use a second PC and compare the public view with what appears on your personal computer.
Cyberstalkers create computer-specific views. Major Internet sites seldom have down time. Sometimes when cyberstalkers wished to prevent my publishing, they would send a false response to my attempts to log on at the sites. Several times I tied to access sites where I publish and reached a screen with the company's logo that said "Site down for maintenance," but the sites were not really down and the company did not issue the notice. I discovered it was a false notice for my computer only. I either ask friends to try to access the site to see if they get the same notice, or I call the Internet company that is supposedly "closed for maintenance" to verify that the site is down. I have encountered that roadblock when trying to log in at NowPublic, Yahoo Mail, Care2, and The Ellen DeGeneres Show. I take a screen shot using the "print screen" function whenever I get that message to prove censorship.
Preventing Citizens Journalism from Becoming Front Page News. Independent news sites determine which stories go to front page by how many hits the articles get within a certain amount of time after they were published. To prevent my stories from going to front page, they are sometimes positioned by saboteurs among stories that posted hours or even months before the date and time I actually published them. That prevents my articles from appearing in the "newly submitted" area and guarantees that my articles get minimum exposure and eliminates the possibility that they become front page news, no matter how noteworthy the stories are. See a video example showing back-timed Internet posts at my YouTube channel. My tweets at Twitter were set to go among tweets that posted from one to three hours prior
Censorship Attacks on Targeted Websites and Blogs.One night I went to the website belonging to a woman who sought to inform the public about her abuse by police. Only half of the data she posted on her website was visible, and her petition for public support did not appear on her web page. I knew what should be on her website because I had visited it before, plus I had received an email from her asking friends to go to her site and sign her petition and see her video. After seeing that neither the video nor the petition link was visible at her site, I sent her an email response to let her know the data was missing. Immediately, I re-opened her website, and the video and petition link and much other data was visible. Apparently, her email box was being monitored, and saboteurs realized she was being informed about the condition of her website.
Because of censorship by America's mainstream media and on the Internet, the only way for people to ensure their justice quests are made public is to conduct demonstrations like the peaceful rallies that Amnesty International and other organizations host to support condemned Georgia man Troy Davis. As it was in the 1960's when Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and over 250,000 people met in Washington, D.C. for the Poor People's March, in-person demonstrations are still the most effective way to have impact. The Internet is not the answer. See photographs of Mary Neal picketing Georgia Superior Court below:
Mary Neal Pickets Georgia Superior Court re: The Cochran Firm Fraud
When Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Freedom Riders demonstrated against oppression in America, the police were used to prevent their justice quest. That remains true today. Two Atlanta police officers stopped my picketing in front of The Johnnie Cochran Firm recently. Atlanta police threatened to arrest me if I did not immediately cease to exercise my First Amendment rights. Since I had brought no one with me to videotape my arrest, I obeyed them. My family and I are stalked and persecuted for asking WHAT HAPPENED TO LARRY NEAL, my disabled brother who was arrested and killed by police, but we are denied any records and accountability. His murder is sanctioned by the government, because mentally ill citizens of all races are discriminated against, abused, and killed regularly in America. My punishment for advocating for mentally challenged people includes in-person stalking and poverty. Censorship is used to prevent my using email accounts to conduct job searches, and lawsuits against parties for crimes against my family are prohibited by the judiciary from reaching a jury. Since that is the case, I have time to write articles, emails, and tweets about injustices and picket wrongdoers at The Cochran Firm, courts, and the DOJ later this summer. An article about Atlanta police violating my free speech rights to protect The Cochran Firm from public exposure for defrauding its clients to help Memphis police escape accountability for Larry Neal's murder is at this link:
The second time I visited the website for Veterans Against Police Abuse, the website's tabs were missing, which limited visitors to viewing the organization's home page only. That is an organization of veterans who continue the fight for liberty and justice after leaving active military duty. They sacrificed to secure freedom for Americans and recognize the need to safeguard their investment in by constant vigilance. The organization's motto is: "We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home."- Edward R. Murrow. Access the Veterans Against Police Abuse website at this link: www.veteransagainstpoliceabuse.org/ and see a video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2kNFbacwag
Yesterday, the "Search This Blog" feature was covertly deactivated for this FreeSpeakBlog until I notified GOOGLE about the sabotage. My blogs are about the denial of justice my family experiences regarding the secret arrest and murder of my handicapped brother, Larry Neal, by Memphis Shelby County Jail in 2003, and I also publish articles about other victims of America's unjust justice system. Put key words like "prison profits," "execution," "wrongful conviction," or names of noted inmates into my "Search This Blog" field to access articles I wrote to help promote justice. Also, use the handy index in the left margin at FreeSpeakBlog to see a complete list of articles published there.
False Security Alerts. If an individual is targeted for censorship, she may not be able to open sites carrying information that she may learn from or spread. Also, some websites are themselves censored, and traffic to those websites is discouraged. False security alerts are frequently used for censorship. The first time I visited IndyMedia in 2007, a warning message appeared saying that opening that site on my computer would harm the machine. Last year in 2010, the same warning message appeared at my FreeSpeakBlog. This is a Google blog, and Google is probably the largest, most respected Internet company. Opening FreeSpeakBlog cannot damage anyone's computer, but the information therein may damage the "Mass Hypnosis" affecting Americans (Google my article "Mass Hypnosis").
Inoperable Widgets. Censored websites have inoperable widgets. Above in this article, I discussed the fact that I am disallowed a "follow me at Twitter" widget because the data I accessed using that widget when it was at this FreeSpeakBlog was my tweets that really showed on public view instead of ALL of my tweets. I was not supposed to have a widget that showed me which tweets were omitted from public view; therefore, I am not allowed to have an operable "follow me at Twitter" widget now. At my new blog - http://MaryLovesJustice.blogspot.com - I positioned a gadget readers can use to post a link to the blogs at Facebook or Twitter. I tried the gadget myself, and link-posting was prevented at both FB and Twitter. The MaryLovesJustice blog also has a YouTube gadget across the top where the public can access my cyber censorship films from YouTube channel jkempp703. When I use Google and access my blog, I see the YouTube widget, but when I accessed my blog using Bing earlier today, I saw my articles, but the YouTube widget was not across the top. (Maybe there is some technical reason for that. I use Google Chrome, but I opened Bing using Internet Explorer 6).
Censorship Examples. Visit my YouTube channel jkempp703 to view some of my cyber censorship videos. Check the channel periodically, because I have hundreds of videos to upload that show real-time cyberstalking. Learn their methodology, and you will know how to recognize when you and others are being censored. If you are targeted for censorship like I am, always work with a digital camera or a video cell phone ready to record interference. I found that is an inexpensive way to capture proof when saboteurs change my online input as I type, when I encounter DoS from particular networks, and when my posts are changed or deleted in whole or in part. For instance, I sent an email to members of the Justice 4 Oscar Grant group members at Yahoo Groups. My video records what I emailed and when it was sent. However, the message that posted at the Oscar Grant Yahoo Group did not have the link I included in the email for recipients to access the Oscar Grant article I wrote about his murder-by-police. You can access the article at NowPublic by putting "Mary Neal" in the network's search field, or browse for it at Google.
I filmed videos showing that my data, including links and photographs, can be rendered invisible on Internet posts. All of them are clearly visible when I work in the edit mode at online networks, but they are invisible on the public view. I sent ecards to notify hundreds of people and organizations about Thomas Arthur facing imminent execution in Alabama in August 2009, despite the fact that his DNA test results the D.A. received in July 2009 indicated Arthur’s innocence. Arthur’s DNA test results had been sealed by the court, and the likely innocent man who has been on death row nearly three decades was to be executed without the public’s knowledge that Arthur’s DNA did not match any crime scene evidence tested. His test results were kept out of mainstream news reports, and that information was rendered invisible on the ecards I sent. I have videos with side-by-side views of the ecards as they appeared with the information I input about Arthur and the empty ecards people actually received.
Examples: I published an article at Care2 News Network about Thomas Arthur, an Alabama death row inmate for whom prosecutors planned to request a death warrant in August 2009 although results from his DNA test indicated that his DNA matched no crime scene evidence that was tested. The test results were sealed by the court, and plans to execute Arthur continued while mainstream media remained silent. I sounded an alarm online despite a fierce infowar. Care2 eCard department was reportedly attacked, and my eCards about Arthur's planned execution arrived to addressees blank on September 1, 2009. I use gMail for advocacy, and gMail also went down on September 1. The battle to air controversial human rights news continues. On March 31, 2011, I received notice that Truthout.org has been attacked, and content over the past ten days was deleted. The cyberstalkers may have taken out ten days of articles to get to a single targeted story. I will follow up with Truthout.org to see which articles it cannot retrieve. I hope they ask the authors to re-submit those. See the notice below:
Dear Readers, Late last night, Truthout.org was attacked and our content over the past ten days was deleted. We're working to capture the cache versions of those stories that are no longer available and republish them on our website. You may find that some links will take you to "Page Not Found." Right now we're working to restore the vandalized stories. We will update you as soon as we have more information, and hope to be back in full force very soon. Thank you for your patience and your support! Sincerely, The Truthout Team
A NowPublic member published a Taser story about an elderly woman who was tasered by police, and it received many views and comments. I cross-posted the news at Care2 News Network where people only see an excerpt from the news story and have a link to reach the full news report. I then wrote a comment at the NowPublic article saying that I had cross-posted the news, and I invited NowPublic visitors to see opinions by Care2 members by using a link in my comment. But when I used the link at NowPublic to get to the Care2 article and comments, I discovered that comments expressing disapproval about the elder getting tasered that came from two people, a police officer and a health care professional, were rendered invisible. I then entered the URL for the article directly into the IE browser rather than accessing the article by using the link I placed at NowPublic,and all of the comments were visible. Perhaps cyberstalkers had redirected the link to lead to an edited copy of the Care2 news story rather than the real one. That way, hundreds of people who accessed the article by using the link I posted at my NowPublic comment would not read opinions about proper police procedure and health risks that came from "experts" in those fields. (That is only speculation about how the comments were censored. I do not actually know how covert activities to interfere with Americans' free speech and free press rights are accomplished online.)
Control over my PC via illegal remote access and/or by putting my PCs on a workgroup does not explain all of the censorship I experience. Some of it has to be done by saboteurs’ influence over the sites where I post. For instance, no one with administrative control over my PC would have the ability to go into Care2 News Network and other networks and delete published news stories and comments. And my PC cannot direct networks to issue a denial of service (DoS) when I try to use their online services. It would be interesting to know whether saboteurs have moles in the IT staff of certain networks and web hosts or if saboteurs have control over the Internet itself, which would make cooperation by online networks unnecessary. I think the answer is both.
. SECURE YOUR ONLINE COMMUNICATION. Anything that limits a human or civil rights organization’s ability to communicate with the public negatively impacts membership enrollment, financial support, and the overall effectiveness of the advocacy. Organizations with sufficient budgets should consider having their computer security system and helpdesk operations periodically monitored by an outside concern rather than relying solely on their own IT staff. Know what data is flowing in and out of your organization, and try to learn what messages are blocked. Pay attention to helpdesk inquiries if you host an online network. The issues network members report may indicate more than malfunctioning equipment or software glitches. Censorship attacks can come from outside or within your organization. Not giving your computer operations good oversight is like never having your organization’s bookkeeping audited because you have an efficient, trusted bookkeeper. Anything can be happening to your peril without your knowledge. For instance, I sent eVites to over 2,000 people and organizations on my Yahoo mail list through American Greetings, but the end report that I did not receive until the day of the event indicated that only 30 of those eVites were actually sent. What impact would it have on your organization if you plan an event and less than 10% of the intended recipients actually receive your invitation?
Despite the expense, it is a good idea to use regular mail and send hardcopies for important correspondence. When you communicate online, what you post is not necessarily what people receive. Furthermore, whereas people are able to file your printed material and refer to it later, Internet data can be surreptitiously removed and made unavailable for sharing in the future. I did an online search for Amnesty International’s petition against enforced H1N1 vaccines recently, and it did not appear (I do not know if it was removed by the sponsor or not). The more advocacy organizations rely on the Internet to communicate, the easier it is to limit their success by blocking their emails, deactivating or redirecting links, issuing DoS attacks to prevent responses on petitions, or making part of the organizations’ data invisible at their websites. What impact would it have if saboteurs made your donations icon invisible to website visitors?
This article has only a few of the methods used to censor Americans online that I have been subjected to or observed happening to communication by other individuals and organizations. Visit my YouTube channel at jkempp703, you will see videos showing some more cyber censorship methods. I believe this censorship can be happening to social network members and blog visitors without the knowledge or cooperation of people who own the sites or host the networks. I hope my videos and this article remind human and civil rights advocates that there is powerful opposition to social justice in the 21st century just as there always has been. Secondly, it is a good idea to ask for paper receipts for voting machines. Never allow voting over the Internet, or the political party with the best hackers would will win every election.
The determination to censor Mary Neal reaches extreme levels and include in-person stalking. Censorship against members of Assistance to the Incarcerated Mentally Ill is intended to (1) prevent minority citizens and others from learning about The Cochran Firm fraud, and (2) prevent advocacy to treat rather than imprison 1.25 million mentally ill Americans. Treating rather than imprisoning people for mental illness is an unpopular concept for private prison owners and investors, who include many decision makers in the justice system, such as judges as well as elected and appointed officials. Imprisoning 2.3 million inmates costs American taxpayers over $50 billion annually, and as much as $185 billion annually is spent when one factors in police services, court costs and attorney's fees. That figure is augmented by millions of dollars prison investors receive each year from prison work projects. Many of the jobs that Americans think went overseas actually went to prison along with 2.3 million people, many of whom toil long hours for little or no pay and no job benefits. Because of the love of money, advocacy that threatens prison profits is therefore severely attacked online. See "Home Invasion" at this link:http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/home-invasion-by-mary-neal.html
There is so much more I could share with you, and I do in various blogs. Freedom of press is not entirely forsaken in America because you are reading this, and I have published such articles for years and yet breathe. I just cuss when the cyberdogs strike, repent for cussing, and keep typing. It is for Christians to work and for God to get the results from our work that He desires. But faith without works is dead. Knowing that the battle is not mine but the Lord's, I am not as frustrated as I might otherwise be with the censorship I endure. Remember that although the Internet is fast communication, it is not reliable. Use peaceful in-person demonstrations and the mail whenever possible, or your messages may reach the public altered or not at all.
I don't know why the paragraph in bold above is set so far apart from the rest of this article. I had trouble adding it. CONGRATULATIONS ON HAVING FOUND THIS ARTICLE despite the fact that it is not on the web under the title that I gave it - "Internet Censorship American Style." Instead, the link says "Internet Censorship: How They Do It." I changed the name and hoped it would change on the web link. After I used "Internet Censorship American Style," numerous other articles and videos appeared on the web under that name. That is called "diversionary tactics." Google censors less than other Internet companies, but I wish my article was called its real title online (March 2011 - The title is online now). Read about COINTELPRO in Wikipedia, and Google the term. See videos about COINTELPRO on YouTube. Find out how the covert government program worked against the civil rights movement in my HubPages article "Mary Neal's Black History Month 2011," and learn how it or something similar is happening today in my article, "NAACP vs. Black Cigarette Smokers." Hurry, because both articles are being cyberstalked.
My most recent article is about two important cases about children's rights pending before the U.S. Supreme Court in March 2011 (determining whether children should be interrogated at school by social workers and armed police without parental knowledge, a warrant, an attorney, or a Miranda warning, then jailed if they make confessions under those circumstances) was unpublished by editors at HubPages - "Juvenile Justice: Kids 4 Cash." Check for that title and you will find numerous online articles named that as of March 7, 2011, then see their dates of publication. Something similar also happened when I published "Michael Jackson's Death - The Conspiracy Theory," which is still my most popular article. (Even if you were among the nearly 100,000 people who read it at NowPublic, please see the MJJ article in this blog. It was updated.) I checked the title of the MJJ article for uniqueness before using it, but within a week many similar titles appeared online - diversions.
I do not know who pays my cyberstalkers and cannot say definitively that they work for the government. If the censorship I found online was limited to my own input, I would be inclined to think it was a certain law firm. However, I found censorship against the ACLU, Amnesty International, Care2's groups Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch (which are not connected to the national organizations), Veterans Against Police Brutality, other civil/human rights organizations and various activist bloggers. I resent cyberstalkers preventing my communications with Cops Against Death Penalty on Facebook. There are many dedicated people in the justice system. They have a right to know that people appreciate them and share their viewpoints with others. Whenever I try to comment on members' posts at that group, I get a message saying my comment could not be posed. (March 2011 - I was allowed to post comments to CADP at FB after this complaint and complaing on BlogTalk Radio.) What I can say definitely is that human/civil rights is attacked on the web using the methods discussed in this web. Please oppose government-issued individual Internet I.D. numbers, or news by individual activists and certain organizations may be prohibited altogether.
WAKE UP! It is KoffieTime! Follow me at Twitter, where I am KoffieTime – I wish I could have a working "Follow Me at Twitter" widget, but here is a link: http://www.twitter.com/koffietime
Thanks for visiting Free Speak Blog – http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/ - Your comments and questions are invited. I advise all human/civil rights activists and organizations, defense attorneys, and YOU to print this document or save it on disc so you can refer to it if/when you need to do so. Count the paragraphs and links to ensure you have it all. If you do not, just send me smoke signals or use a drum. My email accounts and phone are also cyberstalked. LOL! Seriously, television, phones, and other modes of communication are operating via satellites now and are therefore vulnerable. One night I communicated extensively with a fellow NowPublic.com writer sending and receiving numerous emails using our NowPublic email boxes. The next day, she told me she was not online. I went to my sent file to retrieve the messages and forward them to her, and the email strand was gone. Welcome to the End Game. (Google for my article "End Game Reports.") Blessings!
The photo is of my brother, Larry Neal, a handicapped American who was secretly arrested and returned to his family as a naked corpse after 18 days with records and accountability denied. That led to my becoming "America's Most Censored: Mary Neal." See this link http://goo.gl/aELp3 - I founded and direct Assistance to the Incarcerated Mentally Ill ("AIMI"), advocating for 1.25 million inmates who are wrongly and cruelly imprisoned rather than treated for their mental dysfunctions. I love God and the IDEA of America - a melting pot. Many hard lumps remain in the custard today. AIMI members work to have civil and human rights applied to all, including the mentally ill. We oppose wrongful convictions, prison profiteering, excessive sentencing, police brutality, capital punishment, and inequities in application of the law due to racial and economic disparities. We also oppose crime and recognize crime as being violations against human rights and property rights. Imprisonment is often warranted, but never brutality, torture, or death. We advocate love. The need is for America to "be true to what she said on paper" (MLK).
